![]() This sentence, found in a 19th century grammar book, explores just how far we can take the versatile “ing” if we put our minds to it. This exceeding trifling witling, considering ranting criticizing concerning adopting fitting wording being exhibiting transcending learning, was displaying, notwithstanding ridiculing, surpassing boasting swelling reasoning, respecting correcting erring writing, and touching detecting deceiving arguing during debating.Įnding a word with “ing” can make it a noun, verb, or adjective, depending on how you use it. It’s not just required luggage for surviving the weekend at the in-laws’ house- this sent ence contains every single letter of the alphabet, while using the smallest number of letters to do so. The letter combination “-ough” has nine possible pronunciations in English (depending on regional dialect), and this delightful sentence contains them all: “uff,” “oh,” “auh,” “ow,” “uh,” “oo,” “off,” and “uhp.” How’s that for a tongue-twister?Ħ. A rough-coated, dough-faced, thoughtful ploughman strode through the streets of Scarborough after falling into a slough, he coughed and hiccoughed The headache you’re experiencing trying to figure this out is due to the presence of a reductive relative clause, which can be seen in sentences like, “The song heard on the radio was beautiful,” instead of, “The song that was heard on the radio was beautiful.” All we have to do to make this a little more simple is change the first part of the sentence: “The horse that was raced past the barn fell.”ĥ. You don’t really appreciate little words like “who,” “which,” or “that” until you come across a sentence like this one. We automatically tend to assume that “houses” is a noun, “complex” is an adjective, and “married” is a verb, but when you realize that “complex” is a housing complex and that soldiers who are married are staying there, things make a lot more sense. The fun thing about this sentence is that “complex,” “houses,” and “married” can all serve as different parts of speech. The complex houses married and single soldiers and their families. ![]() Stylistically speaking, the sentence would probably be less confusing if written, “He had had a lot of faith, but it had had no effect on the outcome of his life,” but what fun is that?ģ. The first and third “hads” are the auxiliary verbs, while the second and fourth ones are the main verbs. While it may look like someone copied “had” and pressed the paste button a few too many times, this is actually an example of what happens when the past perfect tense gets used back-to-back. All the faith he had had had had no effect on the outcome of his life. While this trick works for plenty of other sentences as well, this one’s short and easy to understand.Ģ. – She stole something of mine, not my money. – Only that she stole money- not necessarily my own. ![]() – I said someone did, not necessarily her. This fun sentence takes on seven different meanings depending on which word is emphasized:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |